Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN532

Consultant Obstacles in Implementing Construction

Work Supervision in Tojo Una-Una District
Mohamad Syahrin S. Lahay1; Nirmalawati2; Tutang Muhtar Kamaludin 3
1
Postgraduate Student Of Civil Engineering Department, Tadulako University, Indonesia
2,3
Civil Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Engineering, Tadulako University, Indonesia

Abstract:- Construction work in Tojo Una-Una not only caused by natural factors, but also caused by
Regency often experiences delays and irregularities in several things, including coordination, communication,
construction, therefore it is hoped that the role of the administration, and empowerment of personnel.[1]
supervisory consultant can be a reference for all parties
involved in the implementation so that the construction The purpose of this research is what factors influence
work process can be carried out well. The purpose of consultant obstacles in implementing work supervision,
this research is what factors influence consultant what indicators most influence consultant obstacles in
obstacles in implementing work supervision, what implementing construction work supervision, and what
indicators most influence consultant obstacles in alternatives can be used to resolve consultant obstacles in
implementing construction work supervision, and what implementing construction work supervision. in Tojo Una-
alternatives can be used to resolve consultant obstacles Una Regency.
in implementing construction work supervision in Tojo
Una-Una Regency . Respondents in this study were 60 II. LITERATURE REVIEW
respondents. Data analysis uses Factor Analysis. The
factor with the highest influence on consultant barriers A. Construction Projects
in carrying out supervision of construction work is the Development venture exercises can for the most part
quality of materials and construction equipment. be deciphered as transitory exercises that final for a
restricted period of time, with the assignment of certain
Keywords:- Contruction, Delay, Consultans, Supervision, assets to deliver items whose quality criteria have been
Quality. clearly outlined. [2] In the current development,
construction projects are becoming increasingly complex
I. INTRODUCTION due to new standards, advanced technology, innovative
materials, competitive prices, and the desire of project
The performance of supervisory consultants on work owners to make additions or changes to the scope of work.
projects in Tojo Una-Una Regency, namely the
management ability to supervise the implementation of A construction project is a series of activities that are
activities, quality control of work in terms of quality and only carried out once and are generally short term.[3] In
quantity, volume and cost control, time control, this arrangement of exercises, there's a handle of preparing
coordination, preparation of implementation meeting extend assets into an activity result within the frame of a
materials, mastery/understanding of tasks and obligations building. The method that happens in this arrangement of
stated in the TOR, accuracy, speed and completeness in exercises certainly includes related parties, both
submitting reports, work attendance. This investigate points straightforwardly and in a roundabout way.
to analyze the variables that impact the execution of
supervisory experts on work ventures in Tojo Una-Una B. Project Management
Rule, analyze the variables that most overwhelmingly Project management is the management of a project
impact the execution of supervisory specialists on work which includes the process of scoping, planning, providing
ventures in Tojo Una-Una Rule and decide procedures that staff, organizing and controlling a project.[4] Successful
must be executed to make strides execution supervisory project management means having achieved project
expert on work ventures in Tojo Una-Una Rule. objectives, namely: on time and budget, obtaining the
desired performance or technology, and using resources
The utilize of venture supervision specialists in Tojo effectively and efficiently. Concurring to Evil spirit Brado,
Una-Una Rule is exceptionally fundamental in overseeing extend administration is the application of information,
venture administration and is entrusted with observing, aptitudes, instruments and methods to venture exercises so
controlling and being included within the extend handle. that the necessities and needs of the venture are met. The
This team functions as a consultant for project forms of venture administration can be assembled into five
implementation in the field, where their role starts from the bunches, to be specific: starting handle , arranging prepare ,
planning stage to the construction stage. However, this is a executing handle, controlling handle , and closing
reality, there are still often delays and deviations in handle.[5]
construction quality at the project implementation stage,

IJISRT24JUN532 www.ijisrt.com 971

Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN532

C. Supervising Consultants
A supervisory consultant is a company or legal entity
appointed by the owner to carry out supervision of work in
the field, during project implementation activities.[6] The
aim is that the work implementation does not deviate from
the work drawings that have been determined. The aim of
supervising the implementation of construction work is to
ensure the orderly implementation and results of
construction work, both physical and non-physical,
including aspects of construction planning, procurement,
implementation management and contract control.[7]

III. RESEARCH METHODS Fig 1: Data Collection Techniques

The investigate strategy is one of a arrangement of D. Data Management Techniques

inquire about carried out, which is able depict the inquire After all the information has been collected, a
about strategies or strategies that will be utilized to compile quantitative information administration strategy is at that
the inquire about. point carried out, specifically the comes about of the study
within the shape of surveys and interviews from specialists
A. Types of Research and respondents are handled agreeing to the strategy
This inquire about may be a graphic and verification utilized .[11] The information administration strategy
research carried out through information collection within utilized in this inquire about is inactive investigation
the field, in arrange to get information to decide the utilizing IBM SPSS ( Measurable Bundle For Social
relationship between the subordinate variable and the Sciences ) for recurrence and graphic investigation.
autonomous variable.[8] Next, hypothesis testing is carried
out. In this research, causal relationship research is used,
namely a research unit that looks for the influence and
relationship between one variable and another variable.

The method used in this research is a quantitative

approach carried out in four stages, namely literature study,
data collection through surveys, data analysis and
conclusions, data collection through questionnaires.[9] The
survey questionnaire was designed based on factors that
provide obstacles for consultants in carrying out
supervision of construction work in Tojo Una-Una
Regency.
Fig 2: Data Management Techniques
B. Location and Time of Research
This research was conducted on supervisory The respondents in this research were companies
consultants who have worked or are currently working on providing road construction services in Palu City. A Likert
road construction projects in Tojo Una-Una Regency. This Scale approach was used using 5 categories, this can be
research will be carried out within six months. This is seen in the following table:
necessary to sharpen the analysis of the problem being
researched theoretically so that the researcher can use Table 1. Questionnaire Answer Criteria
enough time to complete the research as well as the writing
No Criteria Evaluation Likert Scale
process.[10]
1 Very Often (SS) 5
2 Often (S) 4
C. Data Collection Techniques
Data collection techniques in this research use 2 data 3 Rare (J) 3
management methods, namely: 4 Very Rare (SJ) 2
5 Never ( TP ) 1

E. Data Analysis
Deep data analysis study This use technique analysis
statistics quantitative with using Statistical Product And
Service Solution (SPSS) software, namely analysis
factor.[12]

IJISRT24JUN532 www.ijisrt.com 972

Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN532

Fig 3: Factor Analysis

IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A. Characteristics of Respondents Based on Time Factors

Fig 4: Characteristics of Respondents Based on Gender

From this figure, it shows that the majority of data shows that the majority of respondents are men who
respondents reviewed based on the gender factor were men work as consultants.
with a percentage of 80%, and 20% women. Of course, this

IJISRT24JUN532 www.ijisrt.com 973

Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN532

B. Characteristics of Respondents Based on Age

Fig 5: Characteristics of Respondents Based on Age

From this figure, it shows that the majority of survey. In the event that r check > r table , at that point the
respondents reviewed based on age are 36-40 years with a instrument is announced valid, and if r number < r table at
percentage of 53%, then followed by respondents over 40 that point the instrument is announced invalid. You'll be
years of age with a percentage of 20%, age is 31-35 years able too utilize a significance esteem (2-tailed) < α = 0.05.
with a percentage of 17 %, and age is 26-30 years with a In this legitimacy test, analysts tried the comes about of 50
percentage of 10%. respondents' answers, employing a certainty level of 95%
or level of centrality (α) = 0, 05, at that point the r table is
C. Validation Test 0.250
To test whether a survey is substantial for each of
these factors, it is vital to carry out a legitimacy test. The From the comes about of the legitimacy test
relationship procedure utilized to test the legitimacy of calculations, it can be seen that r check > r table (0.250) all
explanation things in this investigate is Bevariate Pearson markers within the survey are announced substantial, so
Relationship. [13] Typically done by correlating each that the information on each pointer can be analyzed
marker thing score with the whole variable score on the encourage.

D. Reliability Test Results

Table 2: Reliability Test Results

Variable Cronbach's Alpha Required Cronbach 's Alpha Note.
Time Factor (X1) 0.601 Reliable
Job Administration Factors (X2) 0.798 Reliable
Job Administration Factors (X3) 0.670 > 0.60 Reliable
Material Factor (X4) 0.837 Reliable
Labor Factor (X5) 0.846 Reliable
Fund Factor (X6) 0.787 Reliable

From the comes about of the unwavering quality test E. Factor Analysis
over, it is known that the Cronbach's Alpha esteem for each The stages of the calculate investigation prepare are
variable is more prominent than the specified Cronbach's selecting suitable markers for calculate investigation by
Alpha esteem, specifically 0.60. These results prove that all carrying out the KMO and Bartlett's Test, MSA Test, at that
explanations within the survey are announced solid, so it point deciding the number of variables by extricating
can be said that the survey has reliable comes about if markers and turning components and at last naming the
measurements are carried out at distinctive times and components.
completely different models or plans.

IJISRT24JUN532 www.ijisrt.com 974

Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN532

 Calculation of Kaiser Meyer Olkin (KMO) and halfway relationship coefficients between factors is littler
Bartlett's Test Before Issuing than the whole of the squares of the relationship
KMO or degree of inspecting ampleness is an list coefficients, at that point the KMO estimate will be near to
comparing the greatness of the watched relationship 1. A little KMO esteem demonstrates that the relationship
coefficient to the greatness of the halfway relationship between factors cannot be clarified by other factors so that
coefficient. Where in case the whole of the squares of the the utilize of figure investigation isn't exceptionally great.

Table 3: KMO and Bartlett's Test

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. 0.783
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity 922,726 Approx. Chi-Square
253 df
0.000 Sig.

Based on the table, it can be seen that the KMO of 253 and a importance esteem of 0.000, which is littler
esteem created within the starting investigation was 0.783 > than 0.05. Hence the information in this inquire about is
0.5 and Bartlett's Test appeared an Approx Chi-Squere considered attainable, and data analysis can be kept on the
figure of 922.726 with a Degree of Opportunity (df) esteem following organize.

 Measure of Sampling Adequacy (MSA) Before Issuance

Table 4: Measure of Sampling Adequacy (MSA) Before Issued

MSA value Criteria Information
X1.1 ,536 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X1.2 ,424 > 0.5 Not MSA Eligible
X1.3 ,167 > 0.5 Not MSA Eligible
X1.4 ,554 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X2.1 ,730 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X2.2 ,626 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X2.3 ,623 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X2.4 ,786 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X2.5 ,591 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X3.1 ,650 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X3.2 ,794 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X3.3 ,458 > 0.5 Not MSA Eligible
X3.4 ,410 > 0.5 Not MSA Eligible
X3.5 ,678 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X4.1 ,579 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X4.2 ,570 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X4.3 ,896 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X4.4 ,508 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X4.5 ,763 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X5.1 ,624 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X5.2 ,829 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X5.3 ,527 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X5.4 ,804 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X5.5 ,818 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X6.1 ,490 > 0.5 Not MSA Eligible
X6.2 ,598 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X6.3 ,754 > 0.5 MSA Eligible
X6.4 ,589 > 0.5 MSA Eligible

From the table above, there are 5 statements that have the next stage, the researcher removed the sub factors X 1
an MSA value of less than 0.5 (in bold). Thus, to proceed to .2 , X 1 .3, X 3 .2 , X 3 .4.

IJISRT24JUN532 www.ijisrt.com 975

Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN532

 Measure of Sampling Adequacy (MSA) after Issue

Table 5: Measure of Sampling Adequacy (MSA) After Issued

MSA Value Criteria Information
X1.1 ,511 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X1.4 ,681 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X2.1 ,847 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X2.2 ,819 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X2.3 ,813 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X2.4 ,787 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X2.5 ,654 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X3.1 ,843 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X3.3 ,743 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X3.5 ,824 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X4.1 ,650 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X4.2 ,790 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X4.3 ,865 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X4.4 ,817 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X4.5 ,732 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X5.1 ,818 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X5.2 ,791 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X5.3 ,839 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X5.4 ,897 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X5.5 ,886 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X6.2 ,802 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X6.3 ,719 > 0.50 MSA Eligible
X6.4 ,701 > 0.50 MSA Eligible

After rehashing the MSA examination, no sub-factors  Factor Loading

were found that were underneath standard or did not meet Stacking is the greatness of the relationship between
the necessities, meaning that the 17 sub-factors over had the explanation and the components or components shaped.
MSA values. 0.5 so that information from the 23 sub- From here, data can be gotten that the biggest relationship
factors can be proceeded in assist examination. esteem for each figure (component) demonstrates that the
sub-factor is included in that calculate. The calculate
esteem taken is the calculate esteem with the most elevated
esteem. So, based on the comes about of the examination,
the division of calculate bunches is as takes after:

IJISRT24JUN532 www.ijisrt.com 976

Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN532

Table 6: Factor Loading

Factor Analysis -Rotates Componet Matrix (Rotated example, the Contractor submits materials for several
Component Matrix, Extraction Methode: Principal products in accordance with the provisions in the RKS
Component Analysis, Rotation Metthod: Varimax with to the Field Supervision Consultant, Work Inspection
Kaiser Normalization. Team and Activity Executor.

Based on the characteristics of the variables that shape  Provide necessary instructions and instructions to the
5 unused components or variables, the creator will donate Contractor in carrying out the work so that it actually
names to the 5 unused components. making this calculate a takes place in accordance with the provisions of the
calculate that has an impact on the execution of contract. For example, the Assignor/Activity Executor
development laborers on ventures within the Tojo Una-Una and the Field Supervision Consultant have the right to
locale region. issue instructions for the Contractor to dismantle any
work that has been closed for inspection or arrange for
F. Alternatives implemented in resolving consultant testing of materials or items both that have been and
obstacles in implementing construction work have not been included in the work or that have been
supervision in Tojo Una-Una Regency carried out. Costs for work and so on are the
contractor's responsibility to be completed in
 Evaluate, coordinate and control the construction accordance with the contract documents. In addition,
activity program prepared by the Contractor which the Assignor or Activity Executor and Field Supervision
consists of a program for achieving construction targets, Consultant have the right to issue instructions to remove
a program for the provision and use of materials, a from the work site any works, materials or items that do
program for the provision and use of information, a not comply with the contract documents.
program for the provision and use of funds. For

IJISRT24JUN532 www.ijisrt.com 977

Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN532

 Carry out inspections and inspections of all work areas materials and guarantee that the properties and contracts of
and all agencies that support the implementation of the material truly meet the requirements in the
work. specifications.
 Carrying out checks on construction materials required
to obtain assurance that the work has been carried out in ACKNOWLEDGMENT
accordance with specifications. For example,
discussion: in this case, the Field Supervision Thank you to all the teachers in the Master of Civil
Consultant must check that building Engineering Study Program, the Leadership of Tadulako
materials/local/local labor meet technical requirements, University and the Government of Tojo Una-Una Regency,
in accordance with existing regulations (RKS) and are Central Sulawesi Province, Indonesia.
recommended to be used by obtaining written
permission from the Supervising Consultant, Work REFERENCES
Inspection Team (TPP ) and Activity Executor.
 Check the Contractor's work plan in relation to the [1]. L. H. Forbes, S. M. Ahmed, T. & Francis, C. Boca,
equipment used, locations of construction material R. London, And N. York, “Modern Construction
sources and ensure that the nature and contract of the Lean Project Delivery And Integrated Practices.”
material truly meets the requirements in the [2]. R. A. Lundin And A. Soderholm, “A Theory Of The
specifications. For example, the Contractor guarantees Temporary Organization,” 1995.
that all building materials and equipment provided [3]. M. M. A. Khalfan, P. Mcdermott, And W. Swan,
according to the contract documents are new and all “Building Trust In Construction Projects,” Supply
work results are of good quality, free from defects. All Chain Management, Vol. 12, No. 6, Pp. 385–391,
work that does not comply with this standard can be 2007, Doi: 10.1108/13598540710826308.
considered defective (damaged). [4]. Kathy. Schwalbe, Introduction To Project
Management.
V. CONCLUSION [5]. A. Tereso, P. Ribeiro, G. Fernandes, I. Loureiro,
And M. Ferreira, “Project Management Practices In
Based on the research results which have been Private Organizations,” Project Management
discussed systematically, there are five main factors that Journal, Vol. 50, No. 1, Pp. 6–22, Feb. 2019, Doi:
influence consultant obstacles in carrying out supervision 10.1177/8756972818810966.
of construction work in Tojo Una-Una Regency, these five [6]. W. Pratondo, B. Witjaksana, And H. T. Tjendani,
factors are; 1) Material Quality Factors, Labor and “Analysis Of Contract Change Order (Cco) Costs In
Construction Equipment, 2) Coordination Factors of Project Building Construction Projects,” International
Owners and Consultants, 3) Number of Labor Factors, 4) Journal On Advanced Technology, Vol. 3, No. 1,
Capital Factors and 5) Administrative Factors. The 2024, [Online]. Available:
magnitude of the influence produced by these five factors Https://Ojs.Transpublika.Com/Index.Php/Ijateis/
on the implementation of construction work supervision is [7]. B. L. Toliver, J. W. Eggstaff, And M. Islam,
69.175%, while the remaining 30.825% comes from other “Implementing Project Management Plans To
factors outside of the indicators used in this research. The Control Construction Costs On Military Projects In
factor with the highest influence on consultant barriers in Korea Professor Of Engineering Management And
carrying out supervision of construction work is the quality Systems Engineering Professor Of Engineering
factor of construction materials and equipment which Management And Systems Engineering,” 2003.
reached 41.07%. Indicators that influence consultant [8]. D. E. Polkinghorne, “Language And Meaning: Data
obstacles in carrying out supervision of construction work Collection In Qualitative Research,” Journal Of
in Tojo Una-Una Regency are delays in sending materials Counseling Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 2. Pp. 137–
to the location, material theft occurs, poor quality of labor, 145, Apr. 2005. Doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137.
equipment used is outdated so it often breaks down, [9]. N. V. K. Jasti And R. Kodali, “A Literature Review
increases in material prices. on the market, unavailability of Of Empirical Research Methodology In Lean
materials on the market, and the quality of the equipment Manufacturing,” International Journal Of
used is not suitable. For alternatives in resolving the Operations And Production Management, Vol. 34,
Consultant's obstacles in the Implementation of Supervision No. 8. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Pp. 1080–
of Construction Work in Tojo Una-Una Regency, namely 1122, 2014. Doi: 10.1108/Ijopm-04-2012-0169.
Evaluating, coordinating and controlling the construction [10]. M. Haroon, P. Gallagher, O. F. Handling, T. K.
activity program prepared by the Contractor, Providing Kvien, And O. Fitzgerald, “Diagnostic Delay Of
necessary instructions and instructions to the Contractor in More Than 6 Months Contributes To Poor
carrying out the work, Carrying out inspections and Radiographic And Functional Outcome In Psoriatic
examinations of all work areas and all agencies that support Arthritis”, Doi: 10.1136/Annrheumdis.
the implementation of the work, Carry out checks on the [11]. P. Ngulube, “2) (Forthcoming),” African Journal Of
construction materials needed to obtain a guarantee that the Library, Archives And Information Science, Vol. 24,
work has been carried out in accordance with the 2009, Doi: 10.13140/Rg.2.1.2778.4162.
specifications, Check the Contractor's work plan in relation
to the equipment used, locations of sources of construction

IJISRT24JUN532 www.ijisrt.com 978

Volume 9, Issue 6, June – 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN532

[12]. M. Alwan And M. T. Alshurideh, “The Effect Of

Digital Marketing On Purchase Intention:
Moderating Effect Of Brand Equity,” International
Journal Of Data And Network Science, Vol. 6, No.
3, Pp. 837–848, Jun. 2022, Doi:
10.5267/J.Ijdns.2022.2.012.
[13]. J. Rattray And M. C. Jones, “Essential Elements Of
Questionnaire Design And Development,” Journal
Of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 16, No. 2. Pp. 234–243,
Feb. 2007. Doi: 10.1111/J.1365-
2702.2006.01573.X.

IJISRT24JUN532 www.ijisrt.com 979