Why the EU will not seize Russian state assets to rebuild Ukraine
It fears the precedent of undermining state immunity under international law
“BANK ROBBERS should not expect banks to honour their safe deposit boxes.” So write Larry Summers, formerly America’s Treasury secretary, and his co-authors in a recent article arguing in favour of seizing Russian assets in Western accounts. More than €200bn ($225bn) of Russian central-bank assets are frozen in the EU alone. Politicians in the bloc’s eastern states, not to mention in Ukraine, want them used to pay for the damages caused by Russia’s invasion. The problem is that under international law there is no clear-cut way to seize those assets without a vote in the UN Security Council, a judgment by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) or a post-war settlement. Each of those would require Russia’s agreement.
This article appeared in the Europe section of the print edition under the headline "Come and take them—if you can"
Europe July 22nd 2023
- Post-mutiny Moscow descends into factional murk
- Zaporizhia braces itself for Russian nuclear tricks
- France’s foreign-policy revolution
- Why the EU will not seize Russian state assets to rebuild Ukraine
- How Ukrainian refugee entrepreneurs are changing Poland
- A spat in Brussels pits an open vision of Europe against an insular one
More from Europe
The EU’s best-laid plans for expansion are clashing with reality
For now “phoney enlargement” is the order of the day
Turkish women should soon be allowed keep their maiden names
But the law is still fuzzy
Volodymyr Zelensky’s five-year term ends on May 20th
But he has no plans to step down or call an election during wartime